This post is an attempt to talk about the cartoon without a strong (yes, in general, even weak) deepening into details. Try to maintain a pure perception for viewing and interest the main details of the work. I really hope that in the comments, tell me, I got it or not. Preferably with explanations.
In early youth, I had a habit: take one video cassette and revise it for a whole week, review and review it. “The armor of God”, “Dismantling in the Bronx”, “Three of the Prostokvashino”, “Pirates of the Caribbean”, “Anastasia” – all these and many other paintings were learned to little noticeable scenes and barely distinguishable phrases. Perhaps something happened to the cinema, or maybe with his perception by his author, but the desire to reconsider new films almost does not arise. In this case, why not turn to the creations of the past?
Pictures are not in vain imprisoned for a spoiler. They do not carry the plot background, but they can spoil the discoverer’s effect, so blame yourself for yourself.
The world that I saw
Accepting the picture with a pure mind, you will smoothly plunge into a new reality, ask questions about things that are happening in it, and evenly receive answers to them. You will become a researcher, a pioneer, and the joy of opening and awareness will follow you on the heels. A strange type of plant, colossal size of a creature, an unusual type of mechanism – all this will appear before your eyes.
To a large extent, such a sensation is tied to the visual component of the cartoon. The world, which has long survived the apocalypse, is covered with a rapidly growing forest, whose disputes are deadly for the human being. Similar paintings of the decline of the old world and the heyday of the new at the same time attract the look and leave a feeling of danger, anxiety before the unknown. But in this terrible time, one of the few calm and peaceful places is the sky. Pure and beautiful blue sky.
Growing up a fairy tale
Having looked at the film with a more strict look, we can say that “Noncisious from the Valley of the Winds” consists of two main elements: research and action. They, under the control of the artist’s solid hand, smoothly flowing one into another, hold the viewer to present information about the world and the disclosure of the characters, or the scenes of chases and battles, saturated with dynamics, or even together. In fact, the whole film is a colorful canvas, gradually growing from a small notebook pattern to a picture.
This painting is complemented by unconditionally correct, filigently selected musical accompaniment. It captivates with smooth intellectual flights, tears the chest from pain at the moments of the tragedy, makes you squeeze into the chair during the chase and twists the nerves into the knot from tension. Bravo! Brilliantly! Fabulous!
In the creation of Hayao Miyadzyak there are no light solutions, causeless acts, as there is no absolute evil you need to fight, only the difference in motives, goals and views. It is worth saying that some scenes in the cartoon are not afraid to sprinkle the screen with blood. Let it be in small quantities, but it turns out to be enough to convey the serious mood and the stiffness of certain moments of the film. Thanks to these and other details, the cartoon is perceived as a mature fairy tale, who realized the hard laws of the adult world, but still preserved faith in humanity and a bright future.
But still, it is worth saying that the film contains one phrase dropped in passing, which should have consequences, but for some country, a clearly inexplicable reason, these consequences do not have. Perhaps the mistake of the translators, perhaps, the disclosure of the scriptwriters, or maybe my oversight.
***
“Noncosy from the Wind Valley” An unconditionally excellent project with an interesting story, bewitching production, enveloping the atmosphere and music that perfectly conveys the mood of each moment of the film. Throughout the viewing, the picture develops and changes, leaving a feeling of a full -fledged finished story, but also the world, whose life will go further after the final credits. And in order to once again visit the Valley of the Winds, survive the sorrows and joy of its inhabitants, the author of these lines starts this picture again and again.
I give an honor to this spoiler and say “thank you” an account that helped me when writing the material:
P.S. If you are unhappy with the article, now you know who you need to beat)).
The best comments
Firstly, I did not look (yes when I already get to Miyazaki. ), therefore, perceive the further what I said with this correction.
Actually, for those who https://amberspins-casino.co.uk/ have not watched, this post does not bring useful information. Your enthusiasm is not so exciting that I rush immediately to watch the picture. Moreover, you seem to be embarrassed by the thought of the tree, although this was your original plan (to describe impressions without going into specifics). In the end – dry, uninteresting.
Well, if you take up the description of emotions and impressions, do not be shy about so. This is a blog.
So, the author is what kind of outrages, well, how, in the previous times, you are detailed, on a grand scale. And then relaxed!
Well, yes, you explained to me. It’s better to tell others at the beginning of the review, otherwise you will wait a little different, unlike what you get in the end)
"Caliostro Castle", as I understand it, is exclusively for "viewing for a box" is intended. And in the post … not bad, not dry listing of shortcomings. But you can do it much better. Actually, below you everything is good already a little earlier than me described.
It is necessary to demand a mention from you in the article, since I edited and advised in some aspects (XD) when writing it)
P.S. You can’t praise yourself – no one will praise.
There the whole text is one big example. He is bulky, for too long leads to a simple thought. The simpler the thought, the shorter you need to talk about it and not hold the reader by the idiot.
And the mention of the pilot, mask, huge ant, mushrooms and vast creature? These are IMHO also spoilers, let the small.
These are not spoilers. It is how to say that “dude, there is space in Interstellar!" – and you in response:" Spoiler!"
Well, do not fall to the extremes 🙂 You did not say what the mask means, what kind of pilot, what kind of mushrooms.
You can praise you for the desire to in no way to dispose and spoil the beginnings of the impression, but still, it seems to me that you can tell a little more about the essence of the work) a little about the plot and details that can be entrusted to view. I myself watched this picture, so I understand what you are writing about, but, as you see, those who have not watched a little difficult to perceive your emotions)
These are not spoilers. It is how to say that “dude, there is space in Interstellar!" – and you in response:" Spoiler!"
As Anubis sometimes tells me: “In order not to say too much, consider that everything is a spoiler!"))
Yes, I think you’re right. Simply, I remember my feelings from clean viewing (when I knew at the beginning of viewing only the name of the director), I want others to experience him. At the same time, I perfectly understand what one likes, it may not like the other, so the phrase “I really liked the film, and I think that you should also watch it” for viewing does not motivate. I have to go into details already, tell in more detail. The easiest way is to convince me to watch the movie by completely telling its plot. (The stories of Anubis and Alamonalla, by the way, are sometimes better than the film itself).
There the whole text is one big example. He is bulky, for too long leads to a simple thought. The simpler the thought, the shorter you need to talk about it and not hold the reader by the idiot.
Hmm … I would still think, and I would choose something average. You are right, the second option is more visual and easier, but the first is more smooth and in places, complements the second.
Simply, I remember my feelings from clean viewing (when I knew at the beginning of viewing only the name of the director), I want others to experience him.
Raising some questions – does not spoil anything. The person, when he looks, will be puzzled in the same way: “What kind of pilot is this?". And the answer will turn out already, without you. You don’t spoil anything. Yes, there are some questions that are spoilers or are already a product of someone else’s thought process – they do not need to be voiced. And the given by you is OK 🙂
Thank you ))
If you believe the documentary film “The Kingdom of Dreams and Madness”, then “Nausish” is the second film by Miyazyaki as a director. The first was the "Caliostro Castle".
And another question about post.
I tried to tell about the cartoon more, but at the same time I almost did not go into the specifics, trying to stay as far as possible as possible. How can you evaluate the idea of such a presentation and my implementation?
Great, thank you)).
And what did you learn from the post about the movie?
Yes, I do not like to write something like: great, masterpiece, duck-out! The other meaning is not to see for this.
Yes, I do not like to write something like: great, masterpiece, duck-out! The other meaning is not to see for this.
You can share emotions without it. At the same time, having fully transmitted the whole spectrum of you experienced.
That you liked him.
And what did you learn from the post about the movie?
That you liked him.
In fact, yes. But at the very beginning I made an amendment:
Firstly, I did not look (yes when I already get to Miyazaki. ), therefore, perceive the further what I said with this correction.
For those who watched, your post may be much more info.